Public Discussion Series:
PLURALISME HUKUM DI INDONESIA:
Praktek Tiga Hukum Melawan Zina Pada Masyarakat Gayo Saat Ini
Pembicara: Arfiansyah (Ph.D Candidate at Leiden University)
JUM’AT, 16 OKTOBER 2015 | 16.30 – 18.00 WIB | RUANG SEMINAR ICAIOS
Abstract:
Pada perkembangan studi Islam saat ini, khususnya pada studi Pluralism Hukum, sarjana-sarjana barat mulai mengalihkan perhatian mereka untuk memahami masyarakat muslim dengan memahami praktek-praktek hukum mereka. Masyarakat Muslim tidak hanya terikat dan tunduk pada Hukum Negara, namun mereka juga terikat dan tunduk pada Hukum Tuhan (Syariat) dan Adat. Keberadaan ketiga hukum ini disebut dengan Segitiga Hukum dalam Masyarakat Muslim (Islamic Triangle), yang pertama sekali diperkenalkan pada tahun 1990an oleh seorang antropolog Belanda, Leon Buskens.
Di Indonesia, khususnya Aceh, umat Islam telah lama bernaung di bawah lebih dari 1 hukum saja. Namun belum banyak studi mengenai hubungan ketiga hukum tersebut khususnya dengan studi tentang hubungan hukum Negara, Hukum Islam, dan Hukum Adat. Dengan mengamati Pengadilan Tinggi, Mahkamah Syariat dan Peradilan Adat di Wilayah Tengah, terutama Aceh Tengah dengan berfokus pada Zina, studi ini mencoba untuk memaparkan bagaimana ketiga hukum tersebut beroperasi dan berhubungan di tengah-tengah masyarakat dan hukum mana yang lebih diutamakan oleh masyarakat. Sebagai upaya untuk memahami masyarakat Gayo dan hukum adat disana. Studi ini juga akan membahas tentang sejarah masyrakat Gayo, perubahan dan keberlajutan pada hukum adat mereka
THE THEORY AND PRACTICE: HOPES AND CHALLENGES
With: Professor Paul Komesaroff (Monash University)
Tuesday, 13 October 2015 | 14.30 - 16.00 WIB | Ruang Seminar ICAIOS
About the Lecture:
The lecture will discuss the theory of reconciliation, understood as the process of communication across difference, with reference both to its epistemological and its ethical foundations. Examples of reconciliation practices in the field of health care will be discussed from around the world and some problems for future practice will be posed.
About the Speaker:
Paul Komesaroff is a practicing physician and Professor within. the Faculty of Medicine at Monash University.
He has a PhD in mathematics from The University of Stony Brook, New York. He has an international reputation in health care ethics, and has a major impact on the field of clinical ethics in Australia.
Professor Komesaroff believes that one of the objects of medical research is to contribute to the improvement of clinical practice and the development of new, more effective social policies.
THIS LECTURE IS OPEN & FREE
For More Information contact us at (0651) 755 2368 or email to info@acehresearch.org
Notulensi oleh Ariane Boulanger
Speaker: Muhammad Riza Nurdin, PhD candidate in Australia
M. Riza Nurdin is doing research on social capital and (“sacred”) aid: civil society organizations (CSOs) in Indonesian Disaster Recovery. This presentation will focus more specifically on the third chapter of his thesis: civil society and sanctification of aid. He bases himself on the assumption the faith-based and secular CSOs “operate within the same legal and political framework of secular civil society” but the former differ because of their religious motives, moral duty and divine incentive (Berger 2003, pp. 19-20). Both CSOs and FBOs compete each other in their service and fund raising (Barnett and Stein 2012). The sanctification of aid is the “creation of the sacred, establishment and protection of a space that is viewed as pure and separate from the profane (Barnett and Stein 2012). He is wondering in this chapter if competition between CSOs and FBOs also happens in Indonesia.
The Humanitarian Forum Indonesia, founded in 2008, make a census of Indonesia’s main FBO: Dompet Dhuafa, Mdmc, Karina, ACE/PPKM, World Vision, YEU, YTB, PKPU, Church World Service, Habitat for Humanity, Rebana Indonesia, Oikumene, Rumah Zakat and also ACT, Al-Azhar, Islamic Relief, LPBINU, MPBI & Muslim Aid.focus more specifically on the third chapter of his thesis: civil society and sanctification of aid. He bases himself on the assumption the faith-based and secular CSOs “operate within the same legal and political framework of secular civil society” but the former differ because of their religious motives, moral duty and divine incentive (Berger 2003, pp. 19-20). Both CSOs and FBOs compete each other in their service and fund raising (Barnett and Stein 2012). The sanctification of aid is the “creation of the sacred, establishment and protection of a space that is viewed as pure and separate from the profane (Barnett and Stein 2012). He is wondering in this chapter if competition between CSOs and FBOs also happens in Indonesia.
Read more: Notulensi: Sacred Aid : Faith and Humanitarism in Disaster Management in Indonesia